Showing posts with label commuter bicycle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commuter bicycle. Show all posts

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Amazing Bike Light Idea

OK, this looks like magic to me, but an engineer friend tells me the principle is sound.  I have ordered the as yet to be produced Magnic Light:

Quote from the developer:

Magnic Light is real !

Magnic Light is the first compact contactless bicycle dynamo - a new invention which we believe has the potential to revolutionize bicycle illlumination. Magnic Light is so powerful and looks so magic at first glance that most people search for a trick behind. They can't believe a dynamo can produce electric energy without touching the wheels.  (end of quote.)

I have spent countless hours developing my version of the perfect commuter light.  Considering how much time I spent, and how much I spent on parts and pieces, this light is cheap at half the cost.  

When I actually have one to use and test, I will update a report. I do think that some version of an LED bike light that comes on all the time, and does not need off the bike recharging, is an important item for the commuter and everyday bike rider.


In the mean time, I have tried to duplicate this principle on my work bench, but I did not get any satisfying results.  It will be even more fun, when I can figure out how to make one myself.


I am not versed enough in electronics to decipher all of the propositions put forward in the forum.  One comment refers to the developer's video and how quickly or not quickly enough that the spinning wheel slows.  The energy has to slow the wheel, you cannot have a power transfer without a resistance.  But, the type of LED light that the product is using could be quite bright with a watt or less of power.  This suggests another experiment.  When my generator hub was new, and it was used to drive a 1 watt or less light, it would also spin quite easily, almost like a wheel with no generator.

My guess is that the light is only marginally more efficient than a very good dynamo, but the huge advantage is that it could mount on a variety of bikes without the trouble of using a costly and complicating dynamo wheel.  It would be a huge improvement over the option of using a bottle dynamo.

I hope it works.  


Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Why does Alaska have the most biking and walking commuters?

The percentage of commuters who walk(relative scale):
Percentage of commuters who bike and walk, by state Many Eyes
Follow this link to see the interactive graffic


I found the map shown above in Bike Retailer and Industry News.  What really surprised me is that Alaska has the highest percentage of walking commuters of any state.  Alaska also has a relatively high number of bike commuters, and the total of bike and walking commuters is also the highest of any state.  How can this be? Alaska is not mild weather, flat land, full of young granola eaters, so what is the reason?

Here are some more interesting graphics:
This one suggests there are health and enjoyment benefits that might result if more people can find a good way to add walking or bicycling as an option for getting to work:


The next graphic suggests that it is appropriate to put more funding toward facilitating bicycle and walking because of the level of use and the level of fatalities.  The "% of trips" part of the graph needs more detail, it represents the percent of commuter trips in the 51 largest cities, not counting public transportation.

“The NSC estimates that every crash fatality corresponds to $6.8 million in economic losses (a figure that incorporates both fatal and nonfatal crashes, and includes both property costs and losses of economic productivity)” source = http://daily.sightline.org/2012/01/20/a-new-low-for-car-crashes/

As I have stated in my post Do Bicycle Users Pay Their Fair Share?, bicycle and walking commuters actually subsidize motorized travel.  For may good economic and life style reasons it would be appropriate to spend a larger percentage of transportation money to facilitate walking and bicycle riding.



Friday, January 20, 2012

You are not stuck IN traffic, you ARE traffic


You are not stuck in traffic. You are traffic.

This billboard came to my attention while listening to The Gardens of Democracy on KUOW.  The speakers are Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer, speaking about thier book:  The Gardens of Democracy: A New American Story of Citizenship, the Economy, and the Role of Government

In the recorded talk, the authors give a very appealing idea of a different metaphor to use as a basis for conceptualizing how we view ourselves in relation to needs of the environment and society around us, and what our obligations for action might be.  Essentially they say that if we view the image of a garden and the understanding that a garden needs tending, this will be a much more useful metaphor than the more common one they call the mechanistic view, that the world and our society are like a machine that just needs getting started and then spins on dependent only on its internal perfection. 

The metaphors we use shape the way we think about solutions.  I like their garden metaphor.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Art, Physics, and the "Adult" Tricycle for the Three Year Old in all of us.


This project started out as lawn art and bike parts salvaged from road dumped garbage.  The resulting ride is even more fun than I expected, but also a bit squirrelly too.

I was a thousand miles from home, visiting a friend who loves yard sales and auctions.  He had a quaint looking but discombobulated three wheel bike decorating a flower bed in the center of his driveway.  The woman who gave it to him said her kids had played with it, but could not make it work.  I was drawn to the trike because I have been dreaming of cargo bikes and bicitaxis ever since spending time in Cuba.  This project might be described as my attempt at an homage to the Bike Artists of Cuba, except they would have done a much better and more inventive job of creating a fully functional and practical.

As I looked at the trike, I realized that the back axel was made as a sort of bolt-on adapter to convert a bicycle in to a tricycle.  I was traveling by Amtrak but the last leg of my trip was going to be on a bicycle, so I did not want more baggage.  I realized I could put the wheels and axel in a box and mail them home for the seed of a very interesting project.  My friend graciously sacrificed his lawn art for my peculiar amusement.

Once home with my treasure, I quickly realized it was going to take a lot of reenforcement to get this mysterious gizmo to support my weight and even a light cargo.  Lawn duty is hard on spokes, and bearings.  I bought a box of spokes and gathered a wheel barrow load of metal tubes and 1/4 inch bolts.  Fortunately, the bearings were salvageable with generous use of mineral spirits, wire brush, and grease.

On most heavy duty trikes they use a very substantial axel so that the wheels are only supported from the inside.  This contraption is less substantial and uses regular 24 inch bike wheels supported with a light tubing arrangement that braces both sides of each wheel.  The axel is cantilevered behind the bike frame, bolting directly to the bike frame rear wheel slots.  The frame must have slotted grooves for the rear wheel so that the chain can be tightened.  There is one speed, using a wheel with a bendix coaster brake.  Only one wheel is driven and that wheel has the only brake.  (I will be adding a front brake.)

My first attempt at mounting the trike axel to the bike revealed that the mounting bolts could not hold the torque of the cantilevered axel.  I had anticipated this problem, and had a plan in mind.  I devised a sort of extremely long turnbuckle to add a brace from the axel to the rear seatpost to create  an adjustable triangle of support.  Some of the original structure was missing, so I added other braces.  I needed an extra long seat post because of the short BMX frame.  This post is also integral to the bracing of the axel, so I found a 1 inch aluminum tube with 1/4 inch thick walls.  It is very sturdy.


The BMX frame came from a road ditch mixed with other trash.  I had one 20 inch wheel for the front.  I figured I could adjust the angle of the cantilevered trike axel to compensate for the size difference between the front and back wheels.  Past experience with other cobbled up blended bikes has shown me that steering is quite sensitive to the angle of the headset.  My first attempt at riding around the block on the freshly assembled trike sent me gyrating into the ditch when the side slope of the street increased.  A slight re-adjustment of the cantilever angle changed the headset angle a few degrees at most, but that made enough difference to give more manageable ride.  The next change I made was to move the seat back and down relative to the crank bottom bracket.  This lowers the center of gravity, and this change also made a big difference in the feel of balance and control.

Specs:
Weight: 67 pounds.
Headset angle: 74 degrees
Effective Seat tube angle: 71 degrees
Wheelbase: 44 inches
Width: 25.5 inches
Capacity: me and two or three bags of groceries.









What's It Like to Ride?
My only other recent experience on a tricycle was riding a very heavy-duty three speed trike.  It was disappointingly cumbersome and sluggish.

My blended trike feels much lighter and very nimble, but it also feels as if the riders's weight is too high and it could get tippy.  One quickly learns to do a lot of leaning.  A bicycle inherently stays vertical, and leans appropriately on turns.  The trike leans with whatever tilt the roadway has and that feels weird.  Perhaps if it had a lower center of gravity like a recumbent this would feel less dramatic.  So, one learns to go slow while turning, but it feels very nimble to turn and maneuver.  I have read that trikes can induce surprising turns because of the three wheel dynamics, the fact that you cannot really lean with the turn.  The net result is a lot of shuffling of the upper body to compensate.  You have to pay attention.

Three wheels actually feels tippier than two, in motion.  Also, the tilting of the wheels as side slope changes can cause much more side stress on the wheels.  The nature of a bicycle keeps the stress centered between the spokes, the tricycle put worrisome lateral stress and therefore needs a much stronger wheel.



But, the biggest surprise is that the trike just feels fun to ride.  Maybe it is the novelty.  Maybe it is the one speed simplicity.  Maybe it is the fact that I can turn around and look backward in a way I would never do on a bike.  Maybe it is some long forgotten pleasure that precedes my earliest vague memories of childhood.  I do not remember ever riding a trike.  My first bicycle type memories are of a wild attempt down the driveway at about the age of 5 when my mom took the training wheels off the bike.   I don't actually remember the training wheels, but I do remember my dad insisting that the training wheels needed to come off if I was ever going to learn to ride properly.

Try telling a 5 year old that a bicycle is actually more stable than a tricycle.  But now, that is exactly what I am trying to say.